Email



Need a link for research? Go To:

RESEARCH LINKS & BLOGS


FIND YOUR REPRESENTATIVES
AND WRITE:

 

Congress.org

 

Senate

House of Representatives

Find Legislative Info

Vote Smart

Act Now

 


READ:

Common Dreams

CounterPunch

Media Matters

The Nation

Truthout


BLOG:

Dailykos

Firedoglake

LiberalOasis

TalkingPointsMemo

Think Progress


LISTEN:


HELP:

RED CROSS

UNICEF


RSS 2.0


Famous Quotes

"Every government degenerates when trusted to the rulers of the people alone. The people themselves, therefore, are its only safe depositories. "
Thomas Jefferson, 1781


"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. "
Dwight D. Eisenhower


"How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg?
Four.
Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."
Abraham Lincoln


"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating things over and over and over again for the truth to sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
George W. Bush, May 24, 2005


About "Researcher"

What are you reading?


This day in history

Article of the Day

Today's birthday

Quotation of the Day

Word of the Day

From:The Free Dictionary

Friday, January 12, 2007

Attack on Iran

Does Bush need a new authorization to attack Iran? Bush believes not. Senator Biden warns Rice that an attack on Iran would "generate a constitutional confrontation in the Senate". Congress did not authorize an attack anywhere beyond Iraq (and the previously authorized Afghanistan).

2 good posts at Unclaimed Territory and Dover Bitch spell it out for ya.

Dover Bitch brings up the point that the "first draft" for authorization of force against Iraq (back in 2002) was not accepted by Congress. They believed it may allow Bush to continue his crusade elsewhere.
From Dover Bitch on the first draft of the AUMF that was not accepted by Congress.
But there was another, crucial reason why the first go at an AUMF [Authorization to Use Military Force] didn't stand a chance: It was not limited to Iraq.
Even U.S. lawmakers who support authorization of use of force said they do not like the last line of the draft resolution, which says that "force" should be used against "the threat posed by Iraq, and restore international peace and security in the region."

That line, say some members of Congress, is too vague and could allow the president to use force in other Mideast nations beyond Iraq.

"That is probably a bit ambitious," said Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Indiana. "Would this authorize an invasion of Iran? Or how about Syria? They're in the region. I think we ought to stay focused here, and that is staying focused on Iraq."

The language could lead to a "miniature Armageddon" or "potential World War III," claimed Democratic Rep. Alcee Hastings, who said he will write an alternative resolution with fellow liberal Rep. Barney Frank, D-Massachusetts, that would place more pre-conditions on Bush before he could use force in Iraq.
The Bush Administration recognized that they were not going to be authorized to use force wherever they wanted and they conceded in the draft that actually passed.
Reading the quotes from that time it is obvious Congress DID NOT want to give Bush any authorization beyond Iraq and to run around the middle east blowing shit up everywhere.

Comments on "Attack on Iran"

 

post a comment